Acne Treatment
Blepharoplasty
BOTOX.® Cosmetic Injections
Chemical Peel
Chin Implant
Ear Pinning/Repair
Face Lift
Laser Hair Removal
Liposuction
Microdermabrasion
Mole Removal
Photorejuvenation
Products
Radiesse™
Restylane®
Rhinoplasty
Sculptra™
Wrinkles & Fine Lines
BOTOX.® Cosmetic represents a non-surgical approach to wrinkles and is FDA approved This procedure results in the weakening of muscles and is not a permanent one; it typically resolves after a few months.  The repetitive use of BOTOX.® Cosmetic three or four times a year can result in very long-term reduction of wrinkles.  Examples of wrinkles particularly responsive are the glabella (between the eyes), forehead lines, and wrinkles on the lateral portions of the eyelids (crows feet).  The procedure is typically performed with minimal amounts of pain after the application of topical analgesics.  The results, however, take two to four days to become apparent.

Additionally, BOTOX. Cosmetic can significantly reduce, if not eliminate, underarm sweating.  The first long term study shows that Botox injections can safely reduce underarm sweat for six to nine months.

On-Demand BOTOX.® Cosmetic
The procedure is now available at anytime!  Simply call to schedule at a time that meets your needs!  No more hassles with having visits confined to "BOTOX.Cosmetic Night".

 

The Fees

First Area $350
Two Areas $550
Three Areas $700

 

See Also:
Additional Skin Care Products

 
I've Got a New Forehead, but It Doesn't Move

 
Buzz McClain   AFTER: Buzz McClain post-BOTOX.Cosmetic, unable to furrow his brow.
 
By Buzz McClain
Special to The Washington Post
Tuesday, February 19, 2002; Page HE01

The phone is chirping, e-mails are waiting and Morgan the mailman is ringing the doorbell, but right now I'm staring into the foyer mirror wiggling my eyebrows.

Or trying to. Up, down. Up, down. This is hard.

My eyebrows used to be so pliant, so responsive, so . . . arch. But now, nothing. Or very little. I feel like Jack Nicholson looks.

My forehead – a former terrace of wrinkles – is now nearly as flat as a mountain lake at dawn. My crows' feet – which used to be multi-tined pitchforks creasing my temples – are nearly as imperceptible as footprints on a sidewalk. The double wrinkles between my eyes (on a section of the face called the glabella – a great trivia question, by the way), once so deeply furrowed they appeared to create a vertical slot to accommodate coins, are gone. And my eyebrows, formerly a pair of recklessly loose-limbed parentheses, are now calm horizontal frames, thanks to eight injections of a refined version of a deadly toxin.

At a New Year's Eve party I met Michael R. Abidin, who with his partner Iyad S. Saidi operates Metropolitan ENT in Alexandria. After discovering that Abidin, a board-certified 39-year-old ear, nose and throat specialist (ENT), also does plastic surgery on accident victims, the party conversation steered toward, um, recommendations for, you know, guys like me: 46 with a face starting to resemble an aerial view of Tora Bora.

"I wouldn't recommend surgery," he said. "We could fix you up with Myobloc. Smooth out the forehead, take care of these," he said, lightly touching the corners of my eyes.

And Myobloc is . . . ?

"It's like BOTOX."

Ah, yes. BOTOX.Cosmetic. Derived from botulinum toxin, the stuff famous for causing food poisoning. The idea of voluntarily – heck, recreationally – injecting botulism into my face to paralyze the offending muscles was . . . oddly appealing. The effects last only three to six months, so if I didn't like the New Me, I'd be back to normal around Memorial Day.

And then I heard the price: $350. Sure, the results are just temporary, but it's a lot cheaper than a face-lift, which goes for $5,555, and that's for the surgeon alone, according to the American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS). And since I'm not pregnant or breast-feeding, the only known contraindications for Myobloc, what the heck? It's not like a tattoo or something, right?

The March of Science

Myobloc is the baby sister of BOTOX.   Both are derived from botulinum toxin, "the most potent biologic toxin known to mankind," says Chris O'Brien, a San Diego neurosurgeon and vice president of medical affairs for Elan Corp., the Dublin-based company with the Myobloc patent.

In fact, O'Brien says, botulinum toxin derivatives were originally – and this will set your mind at ease – developed in the '60s by the Department of Defense for use in biological warfare. "Nanogram quantities can be fatal," O'Brien says, and this particular form of death isn't pretty: Your muscles become paralyzed and you stop breathing.

Happily, he adds, "it's hard to weaponize."

As science marched onward, an ophthalmologist, Alan Scott, reasoned that a tiny quantity of botulinum toxin Type A (Botox; Myobloc is Type B) injected into an overacting muscle could be used to treat strabismus – crosseye – in children. He was right. It was later approved for use in blepharospasm (facial twitching) as well.

A Canadian ophthalmologist, Alastair Carruthers, noticed that not only did the paralysis of the muscle correct the target condition, it also smoothed out the lines near the injections. Carruthers and his wife, Jean, a dermatologist, published their observations and Botox came to be used widely as a wrinkle treatment. Myobloc quickly became some doctors' preferred toxin when it arrived on the market at the end of 2000.

"It's a win-win," says Malcolm Paul, a Newport Beach, Calif., plastic surgeon who is president of ASAPS. Using either Botox or Myobloc, "it takes 10 minutes to perform the procedure, there's no downtime and the results appear within 24 hours to seven days. Last year it was the most frequent, nonsurgical cosmetic procedure worldwide," with some 1.4 million patients injected.

Despite the popularity of the two drugs for cosmetic treatment, the Food and Drug Administration has not yet approved the toxin for cosmetic use – though approval for Botox is under consideration, and some observers are expecting action this spring. The FDA won't comment on pending applications. (Myobloc is not as far along in the process for approval for cosmetic use.) Should Botox be approved for cosmetic use, one likely result will be a high profile marketing campaign for the wrinkle-beating procedure, perhaps leading more Americans to try it. Meantime, Botox and Myobloc injections for cosmetic use are considered "off-label" uses of the drug.

Myobloc is more convenient than freeze-dried Botox, which needs to be reconstituted just before injection. Neurologists, dermatologists, ENTs and other specialists have begun selling Myobloc treatments. It's the ultimate lunchtime vanity fix.

But there needs to be artistry in the application: With fine-tuning of dosages and injection locations, "often you'll build on the success of the previous injection," O'Brien says. "And a few hundred dollars for elimination of frown lines sure beats $4,000 or $5,000 for a brow lift."

But Paul warns that Myobloc's ease of use is a temptation for doctors who are a bit lacking in the artistry department. "Don't cut corners where you have it done," he says. "I'd be opposed to having this done in shopping centers."

But an ENT using Myobloc, that's okay?

"An ENT, they're well trained to inject Myobloc. I have no problem with that."

This May Hurt

Well, that's good. Because that's where we are now. Abidin and Saidi have done up their Metropolitan ENT office to appear more like a tony hotel lobby than a doctor's office. Abidin leads me back to the minor procedure room where I sit in a wide easy chair and, after cleaning my forehead with an antiseptic, he dabs my face with numbing Emla cream (because I'm a weenie) where he is to make the injections.

But he swabs only my forehead and glabella, not the suitcases under my eyes. "You want the result to be 'age-appropriate' and to look like no work has been done," he says. "We could do under your eyes, but you'd look like this," and he pulls the skin of his face back to comical effect. "You'd look expressionless, like you were stoned all the time."

He loads up the syringe. The amount of Myobloc he's about to inject into my face is enough "to kill 50 puffball mice," he says, which gives me pause as I ask, what's the worst that can happen?

"One doctor injected it too close to the throat and the patient couldn't swallow for three months. We're not coming anywhere near that. Or your eye might droop for three months; it'll open just in time for the depositions to be taken."

(In the drug's package insert, Elan offers a more detailed description of the risks: Dysphagia – difficulty swallowing – is a "commonly reported adverse event" of all botulism shots, at least among people with cervical dystonia, the neurological disorder for which the FDA has approved Myobloc. No word on how many other folks would commonly have this reaction.)

Using his Palm handheld computer, Abidin calculates how much to inject at each spot. I'm getting eight injections, and a total of 1,550 units of death juice. The shots feel like little bee stings, and he warns of small bruises. Most reported side effects from Myobloc are from the injections themselves: bruising, numbness and swelling. (For the record, I had no side effects.)

In a few minutes, he's done. There's a tightening sensation across the forehead. I go home and wait.

Was It Good for You?

A day later my wife says she can see a difference, but for me it's like watching a clock's hands move. A week later Abidin calls. "I don't think it worked," I say. He laughs. He hears that all the time.

Seven days after the injections he shows me the "before" photos as we take the "afters." Yikes! Who moved my eyes? My forehead seems spread out, the gash in the glabella a mere shadow of its former self. The skin up to my hairline is nearly smooth. I quickly look in the mirror and now I can see the difference. My face is a bit less expressive – those eyebrows don't jump the way they used to – but the feeling is not uncomfortable. It takes me a bit to get used to the change, but my friends don't even notice that the Old Me is now the New Me.

Yes, but is it an improvement? If I were terribly vain, ahem, I'd say yes. And considering the relatively insignificant risks and expense, it seems like a decent choice for those needing a lift regarding their appearance. We live in a time when hair color, skin texture, facial hair and body fat are entirely adjustable. If it's safe and makes you happy, why not?

But would I do it again? Ask me around Memorial Day.

Buzz McClain is a regular contributor to the Post's Style and Weekend sections.

© 2002 The Washington Post Company